News Coverage of the Reassessment
Laura Ginsberg, writer for The Rolla Daily News recently wrote an article about the reassessment being conducted in Phelps County. It was published on February 28, 2007.
Reassessment in Phelps County is necessary because the assessed values put on the tax rolls in recent years have not performed very well in reflecting true value in money, or market value. By the end of 2006, the residential values put on the books for January 1, 2005 were only at sixty percent (on average) of what property was actually selling for. Since the assessor's values are required to reflect true value in money, a sales ratio study should show that values are closer to one hundred percent of selling price. Reassessment, the equalization of property values and adjustment of values to reflect market value, has to be done in order for the 2007 values to be in compliance with State law and mandates.
In addition to poor sales ratio performance, the values put on the books for January 1, 2005 also did not meet State standards in regards to level of assessment. The State Tax Commission (STC) conducts ratio studies to determine whether an assessor's values reflect true value in money. Appraisals are done by the STC on randomly selected properties. These appraisals are usually based on property sales of similar properties to the selected property. The ratio study calculates an assessed value for the property sample based on the appraisal and then compares this result with the assessor's assessed value. The levels of assessment in Missouri are 19% for residential, 32% for commercial, and 12% for agricultural. In 2006 the STC conducted ratio studies on both residential and commercial properties in Phelps County. This study looked at the January 1, 2005 assessor values. The STC found that the commercial properties were actually only on the books for 24.21% of true value in money, instead of the required 32% level. The January 1, 2005 residential property values were determined to be on the books for only 15.08% of true value in money, instead of the required 19% level. These levels of assessment are significantly less than the statutorily required levels of assessment, and as a result the STC issued a compliance order in September 2006 for Phelps County to bring the assessed values into compliance with state law.
The assessor's in the state of Missouri are required by law to conduct a reassessment of real property every two years, for the odd-numbered year. The reassessment conducted in 2005 was minimal at best. The problem of low property values in Phelps County was several years in the making. Not raising the property values to be in compliance with state statutes is no longer an option. It was not dealt with in recent years and now it is time for the assessor's office to face the facts and to deal with the situation.
